The Mazda 3 and CX-30: both offer stylish design and peppy performance, but their differences extend beyond aesthetics. Contrary to initial impressions, the CX-30’s standard all-wheel drive comes at a premium, impacting the overall value proposition for budget-conscious buyers. This review analyzes price, performance, and practicality to determine which model truly offers the best value.
Price and Value: Mazda 3 vs CX-30
When diving into the Mazda 3 vs CX-30 debate, pricing is a critical factor. The 2024 Mazda 3 Hatchback kicks off at around $25,000 for the base 2.5 S model, while the 2024 Mazda CX-30 starts slightly higher at $26,000 for its 2.5 S trim. The CX-30’s standard all-wheel drive makes it a compelling choice for those living in areas with inclement weather.
As you explore higher trim levels, the price gap widens. For instance, the 2024 Mazda 3 2.5 S Carbon Edition, which includes leather-trimmed seats and wireless phone charging, is priced at about $30,000. In comparison, the 2024 CX-30 2.5 S Carbon Edition, with similar features, is a bit pricier at $31,000.
For those seeking a power boost, the 2024 Mazda 3 2.5 Carbon Turbo starts at $33,000, while the 2024 CX-30 2.5 Turbo Premium is around $34,000. At the top of the lineup, the fully loaded 2024 Mazda 3 2.5 Turbo Premium Plus comes in at $37,000, with the 2024 CX-30 2.5 Turbo Premium Plus just a notch higher at $38,000.
Value Proposition
When considering value, the Mazda CX-30 vs Mazda 3 comparison reveals that the Mazda 3 Hatchback offers a better proposition for those on a budget. Its base model comes with an impressive array of features, including an 8.8-inch infotainment system, LED headlights, and push-button start—all at a lower price than the CX-30.
On the flip side, the CX-30’s standard all-wheel drive and slightly roomier interior may justify its higher price for some buyers. Leasing options are available for both models, and actual pricing may vary based on local dealerships and available incentives.
Performance and Fuel Economy: Mazda 3 vs CX-30
Engine Options
Under the hood, the Mazda 3 Hatchback vs CX-30 models are similar. Both vehicles feature a 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine that produces 191 horsepower and 200 lb-ft of torque. If you’re craving more power, both models offer a 2.5-liter turbocharged four-cylinder engine, delivering a robust 250 horsepower and 320 lb-ft of torque when premium fuel is used.
Each vehicle is paired with a six-speed automatic transmission, ensuring a smooth and engaging driving experience. Enthusiasts will appreciate that the Mazda 3 also offers a six-speed manual transmission on select trims, adding a sporty touch.
Fuel Efficiency
Fuel economy is another key area where the CX-30 vs Mazda 3 comparison shines. The 2024 Mazda 3 Hatchback boasts a slight edge in efficiency. The base model with front-wheel drive achieves an EPA-estimated 27 mpg in the city, 37 mpg on the highway, and 31 mpg combined. The 2024 AWD version of the Mazda 3 is rated at 26 mpg city, 35 mpg highway, and 30 mpg combined.
In contrast, the 2024 Mazda CX-30 AWD is estimated to return 26 mpg city, 33 mpg highway, and 29 mpg combined, according to the EPA. If you opt for the turbocharged versions, both models experience a minor dip in fuel economy. The 2024 Mazda 3 Turbo AWD manages 23 mpg city, 32 mpg highway, and 27 mpg combined, while the 2024 CX-30 Turbo AWD achieves 22 mpg city, 30 mpg highway, and 25 mpg combined.
Design, Interior, and Practicality: Mazda 3 vs CX-30
Exterior Design
The Mazda 3 vs CX-30 visual comparison begins with their exterior styling. Both vehicles embody Mazda’s signature “Kodo” design language, but their body styles set them apart. The Mazda 3 Hatchback presents a sleek and sporty facade, characterized by its low, aerodynamic profile and distinctive rear hatch. Meanwhile, the CX-30 adopts a more rugged, SUV-inspired look with a higher stance and pronounced wheel arches.
Both models reflect Mazda’s commitment to detail, showcasing clean lines and premium finishes. The Mazda 3 Hatchback conveys a sense of refinement, while the CX-30 exudes a more adventurous and versatile vibe.
Interior Space and Comfort
When it comes to interior dimensions, the Mazda 3 Hatchback vs CX-30 comparison reveals that the CX-30 offers a bit more space. The 2024 CX-30 provides 94.1 cubic feet of passenger volume, while the 2024 Mazda 3 Hatchback offers 92.7 cubic feet. Additionally, the CX-30 has more rear legroom at 36.3 inches compared to the Mazda 3’s 35.1 inches.
In terms of cargo capacity, the 2024 Mazda 3 Hatchback has a slight edge, offering 20.1 cubic feet of space with the rear seats up and a generous 47.1 cubic feet with the seats folded down. The 2024 CX-30, on the other hand, provides 20.2 cubic feet with the seats up and 45.2 cubic feet with them folded.
Both models feature high-quality materials and a thoughtfully designed interior, complete with an 8.8-inch infotainment display, push-button start, and available amenities like a heated steering wheel and wireless device charging.
Technology and Infotainment
The Mazda 3 vs Mazda CX-30 tech offerings are impressive in both models. The 2024 Mazda 3 and CX-30 come equipped with Mazda’s latest infotainment systems, featuring an 8.8-inch display. Standard smartphone integration through Apple CarPlay and Android Auto allows seamless access to your favorite apps and music.
For those looking for an upgraded experience, higher trim levels offer a larger 10.3-inch infotainment display and a premium Bose audio system for an enhanced listening experience.
Safety and Technology: Mazda 3 vs CX-30
Safety Features
Safety is paramount in the Mazda CX-30 vs Mazda 3 discussion. Both vehicles come equipped with a comprehensive suite of driver-assistance technologies. Standard features include lane departure warning, lane keep assist, blind-spot monitoring, and rear cross-traffic alert.
Optional safety upgrades enhance peace of mind and include adaptive cruise control, a 360-degree camera system, and advanced features like traffic jam assist and front cross-traffic alert. Both models have received high safety ratings from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA).
Infotainment and Connectivity
In terms of technology, the CX-30 vs Mazda 3 models shine with their infotainment systems. Both vehicles feature an intuitive 8.8-inch display, standard smartphone integration via Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, and available upgrades for a more immersive experience.
Choosing the Right Mazda: Mazda 3 or CX-30?
Deciding between the Mazda 3 and CX-30 ultimately boils down to your personal needs and preferences. The Mazda 3 vs CX-30 strengths and weaknesses can guide your choice. If you prioritize a sportier driving experience with better fuel efficiency, the Mazda 3 Hatchback may be your best bet. However, if you need more space and a higher driving position, the CX-30 shines.
Buyer Profiles
- City Dwellers: The Mazda 3 Hatchback’s compact size and superior fuel economy make it an excellent choice for navigating urban environments.
- Families: The CX-30’s spacious interior and cargo capacity provide added comfort for family outings and road trips.
- Budget-Conscious Buyers: The Mazda 3 offers a more attractive price point and feature set for those watching their wallets.
We encourage you to take both vehicles for a test drive to find the one that feels right for you!
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Q: What is the main difference between the Mazda 3 and CX-30?
A: The Mazda 3 is a hatchback, while the CX-30 is a compact SUV, offering more ground clearance and cargo space.
Q: Which Mazda is better on fuel?
A: Generally, the Mazda 3 (FWD) offers slightly better fuel economy, but real-world results can vary based on driving habits and trim level.
Q: Which is better for a family?
A: The CX-30 typically provides more rear passenger space and cargo capacity, making it a more family-friendly option.
Q: Which is more fun to drive?
A: The Mazda 3 Hatchback, especially with the manual transmission, often receives praise for its sportier handling.
Q: What about reliability?
A: Both Mazda models generally boast high reliability ratings, but it’s always wise to research specific model years and consult owner reviews.
Conclusion
In the end, the Mazda 3 Hatchback and CX-30 represent excellent choices in the compact car and compact SUV segments. The Mazda 3 prioritizes sporty handling and fuel efficiency, while the CX-30 offers more space and a higher driving position. Ultimately, the best choice depends on your individual needs and preferences. Consider your budget, lifestyle, and driving habits to determine which Mazda fits your requirements. Be sure to visit your local Mazda dealership for a test drive to experience both vehicles firsthand and make an informed decision.